The stage is set; it is a lovely evening, which through
strange coincidence of a blind date through peers a date is occurring. Ms.
Chaudhry and Mr. Archbold sit across from each other and make very obvious
observations of each other. Ms. Chaudhry is wearing an outfit that highlights
her qualities of her body very well, and Mr. Archbold is wearing a suit that
seems to be worn out and he seems uncomfortable in it as if he doesn’t dress up
like an adult often. But what do they talk about? What are the first words
exchanged?
These two authors are particular too me in that I do not
believe their ideas contradict, but rather I think they are in a vicious cycle
of cause and effect. Therefore I do not believe they would disagree with each
other because they both make very good observations about society today. But
seeing how its fair to assume both would want to be proven right I do believe
arguing would be part of the situation. Ms. Chaudhry would argue that because
of the growing immaturity of men brought upon by the media and what interests
us today it is leading to women to have to abandon the idea of pretty in order
to be able to catch a mans attention in the first place. I mean between a silky
bright short red dress and a conservative outfit of a blouse and pants, which
would catch most men’s attention first? Right?
Where as Mr. Archbold would counter argue that because of
women’s increase in sexuality and death of innocence men are therefore
abandoning old ways of commitment and settling down to try and get as many women
as they can in the way they see best fit. I mean between the hot personal
trainer living in an apartment who drives a mustang, and the ordinary cubicle business
man with a ford hatchback who looks average but is willing to commit, who would
catch most women’s attention first? Right?
I believe they would be able to have a pleasant dinner with
a side of the age old blame game so many of us often play.
No comments:
Post a Comment